🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are watching closely to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

The European Movement

In Europe, a growing group of countries are moving toward similar measures.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that phones and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". Legislation could be enacted next year.
• The Norwegian government is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an similar ban could be "a potential measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has called on parliament to pass a law raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a similar action, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in the Netherlands has advised families to prevent their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has approved a symbolic resolution calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is given. Although it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the step does not create binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a useful starting point," stated one European lawmaker behind the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the government has kept open a future ban, emphasizing that "no option is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "based on robust data".

Earlier, momentum grew behind a legislative effort to impose controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the administration committed to further research the issue.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. An organization set up by the loved ones of a young person who died after encountering disturbing social media material suggests that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the social media companies to build products and services that are secure and suitable for children," said a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, regulation is largely unfolding at the regional level amid national inaction.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a measure banning those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra time requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted measures demanding adult authorization for teenagers to open social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from certain politicians to follow the Australian path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Global Views

Apart from the West, additional countries are similarly taking action.

• The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international agencies take a more measured stance. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans carry risks and "may even backfire". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to invest in child safeguards.

While this global discussion continues, the actions of this nation and its followers demonstrate that governments internationally are increasingly content to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.