🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an observance that started out as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has developed a commercial tone, growing to encompass events where African descendants are remunerated to address white audiences about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The surge has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has transformed since that time, placing less emphasis on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and increasingly on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the observance is commemorated is a reflection of the political moment. How it evolves is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how critical it is to rethink Black History Month better than the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we saw the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a legislator feels emboldened to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. Meanwhile, far-right parties are growing in Europe as a whole.

In the United States, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the country. A drive to remove African American heritage and experience from the archives is under way. One of the former president's initial presidential directives targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the celebration illustrates how insufficiently it can be effective if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the situation of the contemporary world. It also shows how its short period means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is required. An academic expert, a prof at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just discontinue events including Black History Month entirely, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an period that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an foundation that a lot of work has gone into. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed through the year (as various establishments are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not evade political issues, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What purpose serves simple recognition of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the street? Establishments who observe it should not be pacified with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and awareness of “microaggressions”, but challenged by the dangers that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and adaptive. Perhaps an entire name rebrand is required – Black History is Now Month.